Skip to Content

Who was the last king of Gondor?

The last king of Gondor was Eärnur, who ruled in the third age of Middle Earth. He was the thirty-first and final king, who succeeded his father Eärnil II as the king of Gondor. Eärnur was a brave and skilled warrior who fought in numerous battles and was well-liked by his people.

However, his reign was cut short when the Witch-king of Angmar challenged him to personal combat, and Eärnur, eager to avenge the insult, went to face him in battle. Unfortunately, he never returned from that encounter and was presumed dead. Eärnur had no heir or successor, which led to a power vacuum and resulted in the Steward of Gondor being appointed as the ruler of the kingdom.

The reign of the last king of Gondor has been recorded in various myths, legends, and historical accounts, with some stating that his spirit still wanders the ruined city of Gondor, hoping to return and restore the fading glory of his once-great kingdom. Though Eärnur’s reign was a short one, his legacy lives on, and his name remains etched in the annals of Middle Earth’s rich history.

Who became King of Gondor after Isildur?

After the death of Isildur and his three elder sons in the Battle of the Gladden Fields, the line of Elendil seemed to have come to an end. There was no clear successor in Gondor, and the realm was left in a state of chaos and confusion. The surviving members of Isildur’s family remained in the north, and the people of Gondor were faced with the daunting task of finding a new king to lead them.

It was during this time of uncertainty that a man named Meneldil stepped forward to claim the throne. Meneldil was the son of Anarion, who was one of the two sons of Elendil who stayed in Gondor. Anarion had been killed in the Battle of the Last Alliance, but his son had survived and was living in Minas Anor (later known as Minas Tirith), the capital of Gondor.

Meneldil was a strong and capable leader, and his claim to the throne was quickly accepted by the people of Gondor. He was crowned King of Gondor in the year 2 of the Third Age, and his reign marked the beginning of a new era in the history of the realm.

Under Meneldil’s rule, Gondor slowly began to recover from the devastation of the war with Sauron. He rebuilt the city of Osgiliath, which had been largely destroyed during the war, and re-established the kingdom’s authority over the surrounding regions. He also established the Guard of the Citadel, a company of soldiers who were charged with protecting the royal family and the capital city.

Meneldil ruled Gondor for over 160 years, and his reign was marked by peace and prosperity. He was succeeded by his son, Cemendur, who continued his father’s legacy and further strengthened the kingdom’s power and influence in the region.

Meneldil became King of Gondor after Isildur, and his reign marked the beginning of a new era in the history of the realm. He was a strong and capable leader, who helped to rebuild and strengthen the kingdom after the devastation of the war with Sauron. His legacy continued through his son and the subsequent generations of the line of Anarion, who would rule Gondor for over a thousand years.

Were there kings after Isildur?

Yes, there were kings after Isildur. After the War of the Last Alliance, which saw the defeat of the Dark Lord Sauron and the death of Isildur, his son Valandil succeeded him as the King of Arnor. Valandil ruled for 91 years before passing the throne to his son, Eldacar. Eldacar faced a rebellion from his cousin, Castamir, who overthrew him and declared himself king.

After the downfall of Castamir and his successors, the royal line of Arnor was divided between the kingdoms of Arthedain, Cardolan, and Rhudaur. These kingdoms were ruled by a succession of kings until they were destroyed by the Witch-king of Angmar in the Third Age.

In the South, Gondor also had a long line of kings, with Isildur’s brother, Anarion, and his descendants ruling the kingdom. The line of kings in Gondor was interrupted by the Kin-strife, a civil war that saw the crown pass to a branch of the royal family known as the Ship-kings.

The last king of Gondor was Eärnur, who disappeared into the darkness of Minas Morgul after accepting a challenge from the Witch-king. After his disappearance, no king was crowned in Gondor, and the Stewards ruled in their stead until the return of the true king, Aragorn, in the War of the Ring.

Both Arnor and Gondor had lines of kings after Isildur, although their reigns were often interrupted by wars and rebellions. the kingdoms transitioned to other forms of government, with Gondor being ruled by Stewards until the return of the true king, and Arnor splitting into smaller kingdoms before being destroyed by the Witch-king.

Would Isildur have become a Nazgul?

Isildur, the son of Elendil, was a mighty warrior and the last king of Gondor’s northern realm. The question of whether Isildur could have become a Nazgul is a fascinating but complicated one.

To begin with, it’s important to have some background on the Nazgul. These were nine men who were given powerful rings by Sauron, the Dark Lord, and became his servants. The rings corrupted them, turning them invisible and binding them to Sauron’s will. They became his most loyal and fearsome followers, and even after their physical bodies were destroyed, they continued to exist as wraiths.

Given this information, it’s clear that becoming a Nazgul was not a matter of choice. You couldn’t just decide to become one any more than you could decide to be indoctrinated into a cult. Sauron had to choose you, and he typically did so based on a person’s greed, ambition, or desire for power. In essence, you had to be susceptible to corruption and willing to trade your own soul for power.

So, the question is whether Isildur had these qualities. While he was undoubtedly a brave warrior, he was also a flawed human being. When he had the chance to destroy the One Ring, he chose to keep it for himself, even though he knew it was a source of evil that needed to be destroyed. This decision ended up costing him and his family dearly, as the ring eventually led to his death and the downfall of his kingdom.

This act of selfishness and corruption is certainly suggestive of the kind of behavior that would make one susceptible to becoming a Nazgul. However, it’s also worth noting that Isildur was not the only person to fail in this way. Many others in Middle-earth were also tempted by the power of the One Ring, and not all of them became Nazgul.

This suggests that there may have been other factors at play besides personal weakness.

it’s impossible to say for sure whether Isildur would have become a Nazgul if he had lived longer. It’s worth noting, though, that he never showed any loyalty to Sauron, and was even responsible for defeating him in battle. This suggests that he had some kind of moral compass that might have prevented him from fully succumbing to evil, even if he was capable of being corrupted.

While it’s possible that Isildur could have become a Nazgul, it’s impossible to say for sure. The decision to become one was not entirely in his control, and there were many other factors at play besides his own personal qualities. it’s up to each reader to decide for themselves what they think would have happened if Isildur had lived longer.

Why didn t Gondor get a new king?

There were several factors that contributed to Gondor’s decision not to get a new king. One key reason was that the line of kings was believed to have ended with the death of Eärnur in the year 2050 of the Third Age. Eärnur was slain by the Witch-king of Angmar, and no direct heir was left to succeed him.

This event marked the beginning of a period of decline for Gondor as it struggled to defend itself against the growing power of Sauron and his minions.

In the aftermath of Eärnur’s death, Gondor turned to the Stewards, a family of trusted advisors who had long served as the king’s chief counselor. The Stewards were responsible for governing the kingdom and protecting its interests until a new king could be found. However, over time, the Stewards became more powerful and began to assert their own authority, leading many to question the need for a king at all.

Another reason why Gondor did not get a new king was that its people had become disillusioned with the idea of kingship. They had seen too many incompetent kings, and had grown tired of the infighting and political turmoil that often accompanied royal succession. Instead, they preferred the stability and predictability of the Stewardship, which had proven to be a more effective form of government.

Finally, it should be noted that Gondor’s decision not to get a new king was also influenced by the political climate of the time. With Sauron growing stronger by the day, many believed that the kingdom needed a strong, unified leadership if it was to survive. However, with no clear candidate for the throne, and no guarantee that a new king would be any more effective than his predecessors, Gondor ultimately decided to rely on the Stewardship to guide its affairs.

Why did none of Aragorn’s ancestors claim the throne?

The question of why none of Aragorn’s ancestors claimed the throne is complex and multifaceted. It is a combination of historical, political, and personal factors that ultimately converged to make it nearly impossible for any member of the House of Isildur to claim the throne of Gondor.

Firstly, it is important to understand the historical and political context in which Aragorn’s ancestors lived. The House of Isildur had once been the ruling dynasty of Gondor, but they had fallen out of favor after the disastrous defeat at the Battle of the Gladden Fields. Isildur himself was killed in that battle, and the titular head of the House of Isildur, his son Valandil and his descendants, were cut off from any claim to the Gondorian throne.

This left the throne open for other families to claim, and eventually, the Stewards of Gondor became the de facto rulers of the realm.

Secondly, the Stewards of Gondor had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. They were a powerful and influential family who had ruled Gondor for generations. They had their own ambitions and agendas, and they were not willing to cede power to a competing dynasty. As a result, they actively worked to suppress any claims by the House of Isildur, going so far as to destroy any evidence or records that might have supported such claims.

Thirdly, there were personal factors that contributed to the fact that Aragorn’s ancestors did not claim the throne. Many members of the House of Isildur were killed in the years following the Battle of the Gladden Fields. Those who survived were often hunted and persecuted by the Stewards of Gondor.

They were forced to flee into hiding and live in obscurity. Over time, they became disconnected from their heritage and their legacy. They lost touch with the idea of claiming the throne and instead focused on surviving and keeping their family line alive.

The question of why none of Aragorn’s ancestors claimed the throne is a complex one. It involves historical, political, and personal factors that made it nearly impossible for any member of the House of Isildur to assert their claim. However, despite these obstacles, Aragorn ultimately did claim the throne and prove himself to be a worthy ruler of Gondor.

Why was Denethor not king?

Denethor was not king because he was not the rightful heir to the throne of Gondor. The Kingdom of Gondor had a long tradition of following the line of descent from Isildur, the first High King of Gondor. Isildur was succeeded by his son, Valandil, and from there the line of descent continued through many generations until the present day.

Denethor was not part of this line, as he was descended from Anárion, Isildur’s younger son who founded the city of Minas Anor (later Minas Tirith), but was not part of the line of descent that led to the High Kings.

Furthermore, Denethor’s father, Ecthelion II, was King’s Steward of Gondor, a position that was second in authority only to the King himself. The office of the Steward was created by the Númenóreans in exile in Middle-earth as a way to govern their territories in the absence of the King. The Steward was appointed by the King and was charged with ruling the land in his name until the King returned.

However, as the line of the Kings became weaker and less frequent in their appearances, the Steward came to be viewed as the de facto ruler of Gondor. Thus, Ecthelion II being the Steward of Gondor meant that he was in charge of the kingdom, but not the king.

Moreover, Denethor himself never attempted to claim the throne. He seems to have been content to serve as his father’s Steward and continue the traditions of his office. It is possible that he recognized the authority of the line of the Kings and did not wish to challenge it. Alternatively, he may have been aware that his own line of descent was not strong enough to justify a claim to the throne.

Denethor was not king because he was not a member of the line of descent that led to the High Kings of Gondor. He was content to serve as his father’s Steward, and there is no evidence to suggest that he ever attempted to claim the throne.

How long did Arwen live after Aragorn died?

Arwen, the daughter of Elrond, was a Half-Elf and therefore had the choice to decide whether to live as an immortal Elf or to become mortal like humans. She chose to become mortal by marrying Aragorn and giving up her immortality. After Aragorn’s death, Arwen was overcome by grief and decided to flee to the Undying Lands, where the immortals lived.

It is said that she lived there until the end of the world in peace, but exact dates of her life after Aragorn’s death are not mentioned in Tolkien’s works.

In the books, Arwen’s character is not developed extensively, and her life after Aragorn’s death is not elaborated upon. However, it is mentioned in appendices to “The Lord of the Rings” that Arwen gave birth to a son, who was named Eldarion, before Aragorn’s death. This indicates that she lived for some time after her husband’s death.

In the movie adaptation of “The Lord of the Rings,” Arwen is given a more prominent role, and her fate after Aragorn’s death is shown. In a poignant scene, Arwen is seen on her deathbed, surrounded by her children and Aragorn’s loyal companions as she passes away. The scene suggests that Arwen lived for many years after Aragorn’s death, despite being mortal.

The exact length of Arwen’s life after Aragorn’s death is not explicitly stated in Tolkien’s works, but it is implied that she lived for some time as a mortal, possibly until the end of the world. In the movie adaptation, Arwen’s life after Aragorn’s death is depicted differently, with her passing away after many years of life.

Is Aragorn the rightful King of Gondor True or false?

True! Aragorn is indeed the rightful King of Gondor. He is a direct descendant of Isildur, the first High King of Gondor, who defeated the dark lord Sauron in the War of the Last Alliance. Isildur claimed the One Ring as a spoil of war, but ultimately failed to destroy it, leading to the return of Sauron centuries later.

Aragorn’s lineage has been proven through the Ages by the use of the ancient Elvish artifact, the Ring of Barahir, passed down through his family, as well as other proof.

Throughout The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Aragorn initially resists his destiny as king, preferring a life of wandering and wilderness adventure. It is only through the urging and guidance of his companions, as well as the prophetic words of the wise elf-lady Galadriel, that he accepts his true identity and rises to lead Gondor in its time of greatest need.

With the help of his companions and his own skills as a warrior and leader, he is able to rally the people of Gondor against the armies of Sauron, and ultimately restore the kingdom to its former glory. By the end of the story, Aragorn has proven himself to be a true and just ruler, worthy of the title of King of Gondor.